If a request meets the required speed and volume thresholds in Step 2, it is categorized as Under Evaluation and moves forward to Step 3 for additional data collection and scoring. The scoring method utilizes a data-driven process to prioritize locations that have the highest safety risk and greatest opportunity for improvement. This process ensures staff focus resources where they are most needed based on safety, accessibility, and connectivity. Locations may move up in priority as roadway conditions, funding, or capacity change.
Scoring Method
Requests that meet all eligibility requirements and data thresholds in Step 1 and 2, are categorized as Under Evaluation. Staff will collect and assign a score to the following types of data to calculate a total prioritization score:
| Data Type |
Data Collected |
% Weight of Total Score |
| Speed |
85th percentile vehicle speeds |
20% |
| Volume |
Average daily traffic count |
20% |
| Crash History |
Reported crash data from the past 3 years, including crash type and severity. |
15% |
| Activity Generators |
Count of schools, parks, libraries, and other walking- and biking-oriented destinations within ¼ mile. |
15% |
| Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program Requests |
The number of NTCP requests submitted for the same location or corridor. |
5% |
| Street Type |
Neighborhood Connector streets, which carry traffic between local streets and major roads, are prioritized. |
5% |
Priority Levels
Because the City receives more requests than can be addressed in a single year, requests are assigned a priority level based on its total score. This allows staff to focus resources on locations with the greatest safety need.
| Priority Level |
Definition |
What This Means |
| Immediate Priority |
Highest safety concerns, ready for near-term action |
Staff will begin identifying and designing potential countermeasures for pilot projects. |
| High Priority |
Notable safety concerns, strong candidate for future projects |
These locations are strong candidates for pilot projects as funding, staffing, and scheduling allow. |
| Medium Priority |
Safety concerns exist but less urgent than higher-priority locations |
Staff will continue to monitor conditions and reevaluate over time. |
| Lower Priority |
Fewer safety risk factors currently identified |
No immediate project is planned, but the location may be reconsidered if conditions change or additional requests are received. |
Requests identified as Immediate Priority in this step move forward to the design phase, where staff begin developing a package of traffic calming solutions tailored to the locations. Multiple requests along a high-risk corridor will be combined into a corridor-wide project as funding allows. Requests in other priority categories remain on file and are reevaluated over time as conditions, data, and available resources change.